Difference between revisions of "Notes on Final Papers"
From Simson Garfinkel
Jump to navigationJump to search
m |
m |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==For students== | |||
Sections you should have | ===Sections you should have=== | ||
* Background | * Background | ||
* Prior work | * Prior work | ||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
* Summary | * Summary | ||
===On finding references=== | |||
Instead of typing search terms into Google, try: | |||
* [https://dl.acm.org ACM Digital Library] | |||
* [https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/Xplore/home.jsp IEEE Xplore] | |||
* [https://scholar.google.com/ Google Scholar] | |||
===On writing final papers=== | |||
* References should appear *in the text* of what you write as footnotes or end-notes. Do not just include a list of "sources" at the end of your paper. | |||
* References should be in ACM or IEEE style. Be sure to include author(s), title, publication venue, and date. Do not include just a URL. | * References should be in ACM or IEEE style. Be sure to include author(s), title, publication venue, and date. Do not include just a URL. | ||
* Discussion how you found your references. Was this a systematic review? | * Discussion how you found your references. Was this a systematic review? | ||
* Reference every source that you use, no matter how trivial. | * Reference every source that you use, no matter how trivial. | ||
* Include page numbers | * Include page numbers | ||
* How did you evaluate what you did? | * How did you evaluate what you did? | ||
==For Faculty=== | |||
* Don't write what the papers do wrong, write how they could be improved. | * Don't write what the papers do wrong, write how they could be improved. | ||
Revision as of 07:13, 7 March 2020
For students
Sections you should have
- Background
- Prior work
- What you did
- Results and Evaluation
- Summary
On finding references
Instead of typing search terms into Google, try:
On writing final papers
- References should appear *in the text* of what you write as footnotes or end-notes. Do not just include a list of "sources" at the end of your paper.
- References should be in ACM or IEEE style. Be sure to include author(s), title, publication venue, and date. Do not include just a URL.
- Discussion how you found your references. Was this a systematic review?
- Reference every source that you use, no matter how trivial.
- Include page numbers
- How did you evaluate what you did?
For Faculty=
- Don't write what the papers do wrong, write how they could be improved.
