Difference between revisions of "Notes on Final Papers"
From Simson Garfinkel
Jump to navigationJump to search
m |
m |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
*Written for students* | *Written for students* | ||
Sections you should have: | |||
* Background | |||
* Prior work | |||
* What you did | |||
* Results and Evaluation | |||
* Summary | |||
Notes on finding references: | |||
Notes on writing final papers: | Notes on writing final papers: | ||
* References should be in ACM or IEEE style. Be sure to include author(s), title, publication venue, and date. Do not include just a URL. | * References should be in ACM or IEEE style. Be sure to include author(s), title, publication venue, and date. Do not include just a URL. | ||
* Discussion how you found your references. Was this a systematic review? | |||
* Reference every source that you use, no matter how trivial. | * Reference every source that you use, no matter how trivial. | ||
* Include page numbers | * Include page numbers | ||
* How did you evaluate what you did? | |||
Revision as of 04:04, 8 May 2018
- Written for students*
Sections you should have:
- Background
- Prior work
- What you did
- Results and Evaluation
- Summary
Notes on finding references:
Notes on writing final papers:
- References should be in ACM or IEEE style. Be sure to include author(s), title, publication venue, and date. Do not include just a URL.
- Discussion how you found your references. Was this a systematic review?
- Reference every source that you use, no matter how trivial.
- Include page numbers
- How did you evaluate what you did?
Notes on grading final papers:
- Don't write what the papers do wrong, write how they could be improved.
