Difference between revisions of "Census"
From Simson Garfinkel
Jump to navigationJump to search
m |
|||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
* [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Utah_v._Evans Utah v. Evans, 536 U.S. 452 (2002)] Hot Deck Imputation is okay. | * [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Utah_v._Evans Utah v. Evans, 536 U.S. 452 (2002)] Hot Deck Imputation is okay. | ||
==Title 13== | |||
* [https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/13/195 13 U.S.C. §195] prohibits the use of sampling for reapportioning the House of Representatives. "Except for the determination of population for purposes of apportionment of Representatives in Congress among the several States, the Secretary shall, if he considers it feasible, authorize the use of the statistical method known as “sampling” in carrying out the provisions of this title." | |||
==Articles about the Census== | ==Articles about the Census== | ||
Revision as of 17:35, 28 March 2018
Useful things I've learned about the US Census, and references.
US Supreme Court Cases
- Baldrige v. Shapiro, 455 US 345 (1982) Established the Census address lists are exempt from disclosure under FOIA under the confidentiality provisions of the Census Act, 13 USC §§ 8 and 9.
- Utah v. Evans, 536 U.S. 452 (2002) Hot Deck Imputation is okay.
Title 13
- 13 U.S.C. §195 prohibits the use of sampling for reapportioning the House of Representatives. "Except for the determination of population for purposes of apportionment of Representatives in Congress among the several States, the Secretary shall, if he considers it feasible, authorize the use of the statistical method known as “sampling” in carrying out the provisions of this title."
Articles about the Census
- Supreme Court could reshape voting districts, with big impact on Hispanics, Pew Research Center, December 10, 2015
- Potential Power Shift as Court Weighs ‘One Person One Vote’, Adam Liptak, New York Times, Dec. 8, 2015
