Difference between revisions of "Differential privacy"

From Simson Garfinkel
Jump to navigationJump to search
m
Line 33: Line 33:


* [http://www.lix.polytechnique.fr/~dale/papers/qapl-2013.pdf Preserving differential privacy under finite-precision semantics], Ivan Gazeau, Dale Miller, and Catuscia Palamidessi INRIA and LIX, Ecole Polytechnique
* [http://www.lix.polytechnique.fr/~dale/papers/qapl-2013.pdf Preserving differential privacy under finite-precision semantics], Ivan Gazeau, Dale Miller, and Catuscia Palamidessi INRIA and LIX, Ecole Polytechnique
"How Will Statistical Agencies Operate When All Data Are Private?" (MS #1142) has been published to Journal of Privacy and Confidentiality.
http://repository.cmu.edu/jpc/vol7/iss3/1


== Differential Privacy and the Statistical Agencies ==
== Differential Privacy and the Statistical Agencies ==

Revision as of 10:43, 17 June 2017

A few references on Differential Privacy, for people who don't want to get bogged down with the math.

Video

Advanced Topics

Improving query accuracy within the privacy budget

under differential privacy], Gerome Miklau, Michael Hay, Andrew McGregor, Vibhor Rastogi,The VLDB Journal, August 2015, DOI 10.1007/s00778-015-0398-x.

Differential Privacy and Floating Point Accuracy

Floating point math on computer's isn't continuous, and differential privacy implementations that assume it is may experience a variety of errors that result in privacy loss. A discussion of the problems inherently in floating-point arithmetic can be found in Oracle's What Every Computer Scientist Should Know About Floating-Point Arithmetic, an edited reprint of the paper What Every Computer Scientist Should Know About Floating-Point Arithmetic, by David Goldberg, published in the March, 1991 issue of Computing Surveys.

"How Will Statistical Agencies Operate When All Data Are Private?" (MS #1142) has been published to Journal of Privacy and Confidentiality. http://repository.cmu.edu/jpc/vol7/iss3/1

Differential Privacy and the Statistical Agencies


The Fool's Gold Controversy

What's wrong with this article and with the followups?

Other attacks

Math

p for randomized response rate:

$p = \frac{e^\epsilon}{1+e^\epsilon}$

Probability that randomized response should be flipped.

See Also