Go to Advanced Search


Computerworld Home










 
 
Home > Browse Topics > Security > Story  

Homemade GPS jammers raise concerns


By Bob Brewin
JANUARY 17, 2003

Content Type: Story
Source: Computerworld


 
   
 
Security
Knowledge Center

Security News
Discussions
Events
Glossary
Vendor Listing
Resource Links
White Papers
Security XML Feed
Mobile Channel
E-mail newsletters


Knowledge Centers
Careers
CRM
Data Management
Development
E-business
ERP/Supply Chain
Hardware
IT Management
Mobile & Wireless
Networking
Operating Systems
ROI
Security
Storage
Web Site Mgmt
xSP
More topics...

Departments
QuickStudies
SharkTank
FutureWatch
Careers
Opinions/Letters
More departments...

Services
Forums
Research
QuickPolls
WhitePapers
Buyer's Guide
More services...


 
 
Government officials and communications experts are assessing the public safety and security implications of a newly posted online article that provides directions for making cheap devices that can jam Global Positioning System (GPS) signals.

Information in the article that appears in the current issue of the online hacker magazine Phrack potentially puts at risk GPS devices used for commercial navigation and military operations, authorities said.

The Phrack article provides a detailed guide to building a low-cost, portable GPS jammer out of components that can be easily obtained from electronics supply houses. According to the article, the "onslaught of cheap GPS-based navigation (or hidden tracking devices) has made it necessary for the average citizen to take up the fine art of electronic warfare." Electronics and GPS experts who read the article this week called it technically competent and said amateurs with a certain amount of technical skill could build a GPS jammer from the plans.

Although the article said the jammer is designed to work only against civil-use GPS signals broadcast on the frequency of 1575.42 MHz and not the military frequency of 1227.6 MHz, James Hasik, an Atlanta-based consultant and author of the book The Precision Revolution: GPS and the Future of Aerial Warfare, disagreed.

Hasik said that while the Phrack jammer is targeted at civil GPS signals, known as the C/A code, it could also threaten military systems, since "almost all military GPS receivers must first acquire the C/A signal" before locking onto the military signal, known as the P(Y) code.

Hasik said that GPS receivers are especially vulnerable to jamming because of low signal strength after traveling 20,000 miles through space from GPS satellites.

The U.S. Department of Defense, which faces the possibility of having its GPS-guided weapons come up against Russian-made GPS jammers in Iraq, has antijamming technology at its disposal. Still, Defense officials viewed the Phrack article with concern.

Air Force Lt. Col. Ken. McClellan, a Pentagon spokesman, said the implications of homemade jammers described in the article are "somewhat serious" because the use of such jammers "could disrupt commercial operations."

McClellan said GPS experts at the Pentagon do not "at the moment" view homemade jammers as a hazard to flight safety for commercial aircraft or ship operations, "but rather a nuisance."

The Federal Aviation Administration is developing a nationwide GPS-based precision landing system. And the Coast Guard operates a GPS-based maritime navigation system on both coasts, the Great Lakes, inland waterways and Hawaii. Bill Mosley, a spokesman for the Department of Transportation, the parent agency of the FAA and the Coast Guard, said his department is well aware of the threat posed by GPS jammers.

The DOT's John A. Volpe Transportation Systems Center, in Cambridge, Mass., prepared a report in August 2001 that said, "Some jamming devices/techniques are available on the Internet and proliferation will continue, because a single device that could disrupt military and civil operations worldwide would be attractive to malicious governments and groups."

As a result of that study, Mosley said, Transportation Secretary Norman Mineta last March ordered an "action plan" to protect civilian GPS signals and users by, among other things, "the transfer of appropriate antijam technology from the military to civil use." Mosley was unable say whether that technology transfer has occurred.

Richard Langley, a GPS expert and professor of geodesy at the University of New Brunswick in Fredericton, New Brunswick, called the implications of home-brew GPS jammers "scary." But he expressed doubt that the Phrack jammer would be very effective against aircraft when used from the ground. However, Langley noted that if a terrorist used the jammer from on board an aircraft, it would extend the range and "hence the effectiveness of the jammer."

James Miller, program manager for GPS at United Air Lines Inc., said the loss of a GPS signal in a commercial aircraft wouldn't "cause a catastrophic event," because airliners operate with multiple navigation systems. But loss of a GPS signal by general aviation aircraft flying solely on GPS could be "quite challenging," he said.

Warren Morningstar, a spokesman for the Aircraft Owners and Pilots Association in Frederick, Md., said general aviation pilots don't use GPS as their sole navigation source and called the potential of jamming a "nuisance" rather than a safety hazard.

"You need to take it seriously anytime there is publicity about things that could disrupt the critical infrastructure," said Mike Swiek, executive director of the U.S. GPS Industry Council in Washington. But, Swiek said, "there is no need for panic. All the GPS systems are monitored for any type of interference." Swiek noted that while "any garden-variety radio engineer" has the knowledge to build a GPS jammer, there have been few reports of any attacks against GPS systems.

Gabe Neville, a spokesman for Rep. Joseph Pitts, (R-Penn.), co-chairman of the House Electronic Warfare Working Group, said news of the Phrack story about jamming indicates that GPS jamming technology is "easily available" and that the Pentagon needs to beef up its electronic warfare research and development budget. But Neville said he doubts a homemade jammer could cause as much damage or disruption as systems acquired and operated by foreign governments.


Related Content

Technology being tested to detect and report gunshots , JAN 14, 2003

Fruit carrier using GPS to deliver the goods, JUL 08, 2002

Pepsi Uses GPS to Locate Technicians, APR 29, 2002


Source: Computerworld



Page Utilities


Send feedback to editor
Printer friendly version
E-mail this article
Request reprints of this article



Security Knowledge Center

• Security Under the Gun, Monday - Jun. 03, 04:56 pm




 


Sponsored Links

  

  

Prove the Business Value of IT!   Attend Computerworld’s Premier 100 IT Leaders Conference, Feb 23-25 in Scottsdale!

  

  



 
News  Latest News  Week in Review  E-mail Newsletters  Special Coverage  This Week in Print  Corrections
Technology  QuickStudies  Emerging Technologies  Future Watch  Reviews  Field Reports  Security Manager
Management  Book Reviews  Case Studies  Managing  ROI  Q&As
Careers  Career Adviser  Education  Salary/Skills Surveys  Best Places  Workstyles  Search/Post Jobs
Opinions  Editorial Columns  Letters to the Editor  Shark Tank  QuickPoll Center
Events  Premier 100 IT Leaders  Storage Networking World  Computerworld Honors Program  Mobile & Wireless World
Services  Forums  Buyer's Guide  Research  White Papers  Media Kit  Subscriptions  Reprints

 

About Us Contacts Editorial Calendar Help Desk Privacy Policy
 


 
 
Copyright © 2003 Computerworld Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission of Computerworld Inc. is prohibited. Computerworld and Computerworld.com and the respective logos are trademarks of International Data Group Inc.